Re: Proposed enhancement to scp
From: Darren Tucker (dtucker_at_dodgy.net.au)
Date: 02/26/04
- Next message: Darren Dunham: "Re: SSH tunneling/port forwarding and stateful packet inspection"
- Previous message: steve: "Re: SSH tunneling/port forwarding and stateful packet inspection"
- In reply to: Steve Turner: "Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Next in thread: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Reply: Steve Turner: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
In article <_R4%b.24859$V26.14511@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com>,
Steve Turner <bbqboyee@H2OlooWoodworks.com> wrote:
>How does one go about proposing an enhancement to a component of
>OpenSSH? I would like to see an option added to scp that would cause
>the creation of any non-existent directories leading up to the target
>file.
Go to http://bugzilla.mindrot.org, open a bug against OpenSSH with the
severity set to "enhancement".
Be aware that the model for scp is rcp, and if it's not something rcp
does then there's a good chance it will not be accepted. (Also, -p is
already used.)
--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
- Next message: Darren Dunham: "Re: SSH tunneling/port forwarding and stateful packet inspection"
- Previous message: steve: "Re: SSH tunneling/port forwarding and stateful packet inspection"
- In reply to: Steve Turner: "Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Next in thread: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Reply: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Reply: Steve Turner: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|