Re: Putty: Release 0.54 does not work with SOCKS5 server
From: Jacob Nevins (jacobn_at_chiark.greenend.org.uk)
Date: 02/25/04
- Next message: Daz: "Re: Error "Did not receive identification string from""
- Previous message: Stephen S M WONG: "Re: ssh over http"
- In reply to: Mariusz Lisowski: "Putty: Release 0.54 does not work with SOCKS5 server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Feb 2004 10:29:21 +0000 (GMT)
Mariusz Lisowski <sq1bvn@wp.pl> writes:
>I have got little Linux server with work services: SSH, SOCKS5,
>Samba, FTP and SMTP gate. I'm interested in lately added last support
>SOCKS5 connections in putty.
>I try to run it, but putty returns me message: "Proxy error: SOCKS
>password subnegotiation contained wrong version number." and that is
>all.
Taking the message at face value, this means that PuTTY is seeing a
version number in the subnegotiation that is not specified in RFC1929
(which specifies SOCKS5 password auth with a version number of 1). In
which case,
It's possible that PuTTY is mistaken, however. I haven't looked into
this possibility.
I'm not sure how we can distinguish these, unless you can get a
tcpdump of the relevant bit of proxy negotiation to us.
What is your SOCKS5 server?
>I checked SOCKS5 server with Total Commander release 5.51 and it
>works correctly. In this one was implemented SOCKS5 support for FTP
>connections and it works without any problems.
>
>SSH clients which are installed in local Linux system connect with it
>too.
These clients are all using SOCKS5 with password authentication?
Are any of them things that we can look at the source for? (We'd need
to know which version.)
>Second question,
>are you interested in internationalization of putty ?
In principle, but some design & infrastructure work has to be done
before we can accept translations.
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/i18n.html>
>Third question,
>Do you think of adding to putty support X clients, eg. KDE ?
We already support X11 forwarding. If you are asking us to implement
an X _server_, then emphatically no.
>Now cygwin project does it, but it is very big application
>and installation and this is very complicated for users.
>
>In practice simlpe X-server application will be good
>in local natwork.It will be easy in configuration and easy
>in using and stable in work - as putty.
Erm, X servers are big and complicated because the X protocol is big
and complicated. (IMO)
- Next message: Daz: "Re: Error "Did not receive identification string from""
- Previous message: Stephen S M WONG: "Re: ssh over http"
- In reply to: Mariusz Lisowski: "Putty: Release 0.54 does not work with SOCKS5 server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
