Re: When rsa vs dsa
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler (lynn_at_garlic.com)
Date: 01/24/04
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: OpenSSH 3.7.1p1 & PAM authentication on Solaris 8"
- Previous message: bill murphy: "wireless disconnects on XP"
- In reply to: Simon Tatham: "Re: When rsa vs dsa"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:10:43 GMT
Simon Tatham <anakin@pobox.com> writes:
> On the contrary. An RSA signature is about the same size as the
> modulus of the RSA key. So for a 1024-bit key, that's _128_ bytes.
yep, severe brain check there ...
minor additional information as to key strengths ... following
from internet-draft on key lengths:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-orman-public-key-lengths-07.txt
System
requirement Symmetric RSA or DH DSA subgroup
for attack key size modulus size size
resistance (bits) (bits) (bits)
(bits)
70 70 947 129
80 80 1228 148
90 90 1553 167
100 100 1926 186
150 150 4575 284
200 200 8719 383
250 250 14596 482
-- Anne & Lynn Wheeler | http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/ Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: OpenSSH 3.7.1p1 & PAM authentication on Solaris 8"
- Previous message: bill murphy: "wireless disconnects on XP"
- In reply to: Simon Tatham: "Re: When rsa vs dsa"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]