Re: scp over several hops
From: Thomas Binder (gryf+usenet_at_hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de)
Date: 07/13/03
- Next message: Richard E Silverman: "Re: uploading a part of a file"
- Previous message: LoL: "Re: uploading a part of a file"
- In reply to: Richard E Silverman: "Re: scp over several hops"
- Next in thread: Darren Tucker: "Re: scp over several hops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 22:33:23 +0000 (UTC)
Hi!
Richard E Silverman <res@qoxp.net> wrote:
> It does not "need netcat;" that was just an example.
Of course, but it will need _something_. Some customers do not
allow anything but a stripped down system, i.e. everything that's
not absolutely necessary on the machine must not be installed.
That's what I meant - I was talking about adminstrative access,
not about user accounts with a $HOME (I should have mentioned
that).
> A situation in which none of these approaches are available
> would be the exception rather than the rule, thus I don't see
> this as a "big disadvantage."
That depends on your point of view. I prefer doing everything with
the least possible additional software, so that it runs (almost)
out-of-the-box on any Unix-system - YMMV.
Ciao
Thomas
-- Thomas Binder (Gryf @ IRCNet) gryf+usenet@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de PGP-key available on request! Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
- Next message: Richard E Silverman: "Re: uploading a part of a file"
- Previous message: LoL: "Re: uploading a part of a file"
- In reply to: Richard E Silverman: "Re: scp over several hops"
- Next in thread: Darren Tucker: "Re: scp over several hops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|