Re: convenience question of new scp user
From: Richard E Silverman (res_at_qoxp.net)
Date: 06/23/03
- Previous message: Richard E Silverman: "Re: syntax of ssh wrapper for X Windows command"
- In reply to: johan antwerp: "convenience question of new scp user"
- Next in thread: johan antwerp: "Re: convenience question of new scp user"
- Reply: johan antwerp: "Re: convenience question of new scp user"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 23 Jun 2003 12:18:12 -0400
>>>>> "JA" == johan antwerp <johanwantwerp@excite.com> writes:
JA> 1) If the power fails on my computer when I'm doing a very large
JA> file transfer with scp, after a reboot and re-establishment of the
JA> ssh session, can scp simply resume the file transfer where it was
JA> left off
No.
JA> 2) can multiple connections be opened to increase the speed of the
JA> scp file transfer?
No, and multiple connections would not increase speed anyway.
JA> 3) would these features depend only on the underlying protocols or
JA> technology and not scp itself?
Resumption would be an implementation feature of the scp program.
JA> 5) what underlying protocols does scp rely on?
scp uses an undocumented protocol which is essentially rcp. It has no
security features itself, but is run over an SSH connection for security
(i.e. scp actually runs the "ssh" program to connect to the remote side.
-- Richard Silverman res@qoxp.net
- Previous message: Richard E Silverman: "Re: syntax of ssh wrapper for X Windows command"
- In reply to: johan antwerp: "convenience question of new scp user"
- Next in thread: johan antwerp: "Re: convenience question of new scp user"
- Reply: johan antwerp: "Re: convenience question of new scp user"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|