Re: Dropped connections and child processes
From: Darren Tucker (dtucker@dodgy.net.au)
Date: 02/20/03
- Next message: Fred Ma: "Easier alternative to scp?"
- Previous message: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- In reply to: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- Next in thread: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- Reply: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: dtucker@dodgy.net.au (Darren Tucker) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:22:36 GMT
In article <q0S4a.2121$rI4.173060302@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
Ross MacKinnon <mackinra@pacbell.net> wrote:
>By the way, the man page was not very specific as to whether
>the ClientAliveCountMax count is reset any time a
>ClientAlive message is responded to. In other words, will
>the client session be terminated only when 'x' consecutive
>ClientAlive messages are not responded to? Or do they not
>need to be consecutive? Would you happen to know the
>answers to this?
Please trim quotes and don't top-post.
I just checked and it resets the counter on receipt of a keep-alive
response, so it's X consecutive failures. A good response will restart
the count.
--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
- Next message: Fred Ma: "Easier alternative to scp?"
- Previous message: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- In reply to: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- Next in thread: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- Reply: Ross MacKinnon: "Re: Dropped connections and child processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|