Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance
From: all mail refused (elvis@notatla.demon.co.uk)
Date: 02/08/03
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH option to set default hostkey directory?"
- Previous message: all mail refused: "Re: OpenSSH option to set default hostkey directory?"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance"
- Next in thread: William Peckham: "Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance"
- Reply: William Peckham: "Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: elvis@notatla.demon.co.uk (all mail refused) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:30:41 +0000 (UTC)
In article <m1lsmv0faft.fsf@syrinx.oankali.net>, Richard E. Silverman wrote:
>Protocol 2 can be noticeably slower on connect due to the more complex key
>exchange; however, this is usually only a problem on older, slower
>hardware.
Restricting openssh to IPv4 and not IPv6 reduces connection setup time where
I've tried it.
-- decoy mail addresses: obtain username via 0x4f/tcp or 0x50/tcp
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH option to set default hostkey directory?"
- Previous message: all mail refused: "Re: OpenSSH option to set default hostkey directory?"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance"
- Next in thread: William Peckham: "Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance"
- Reply: William Peckham: "Re: ssh1 and ssh2 performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]