Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2
From: arvidjaar (cku192@yahoo.com)
Date: 01/28/03
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Previous message: David Bonde: "SSH-client that suppports http-proxies AND dynamic tunnels?"
- In reply to: Akop Pogosian: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Reply: Darren Tucker: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "arvidjaar" <cku192@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:43:57 +0300
"Akop Pogosian" <akopps+usenet@ocf.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
news:b0skbg$2eu4$2@agate.berkeley.edu...
[...]
> 4. It is developed by people who are obsessed about software quality
> security. A recent security improvement in OpenSSH was the
> introduction of privilege separation.
>
... which broke password expiration with PAM. How do you feel when the only
way login is with ssh and cannot login without password change and cannot
change password because of privilege separation :(
=arvi=
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Previous message: David Bonde: "SSH-client that suppports http-proxies AND dynamic tunnels?"
- In reply to: Akop Pogosian: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Reply: Darren Tucker: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]