Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2
From: ftbee (ft0bee@hotmail.com)
Date: 01/27/03
- Next message: Jonathan Greenberg: "sftp ls weirdness"
- Previous message: John Peach: "Re: OpenSSH + KerberosV + GSSAPI"
- In reply to: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: ftbee <ft0bee@hotmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:23:53 +0200
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> "ftbee" <ft0bee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b0u1vg$ge9$1@oravannahka.helsinki.fi...
>
>>OpenSSH is a nice piece of software, however SSH 3.2 is still way ahead
>>of OpenSSH for the current stage. SSH is more feature-rich, provide more
>>fine-turnings and most importantly has less security problems in recent
>>years than OpenSSH (doing a query in bugtraq you'll see the difference).
>
>
> Horse twaddle. The OpenSSH bugs have been fixed *WAY* ahead of identical
> ssh.com issues
Agree! I believe it'll stay this way. By the way if you don't like the
word "way ahead" I take it back :). Let's say currently OpenSSH has a
*LITTLE BIT* more problems than SSH2.
> (due to similar original code bases).
this is only true for SSH protocol 1, OpenSSH's protocol 2 code has
little to do with the original code.
>It is the openness of
> the OpenSSH code and its heavy use in freeware environments that gets these
> noticed and fixed so quickly, not the lack of such issues for ssh.com's
> code.
>
>
- Next message: Jonathan Greenberg: "sftp ls weirdness"
- Previous message: John Peach: "Re: OpenSSH + KerberosV + GSSAPI"
- In reply to: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: OpenSSH3.5p1 vs. Commercial SSH 3.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|