Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su
From: Kyler Laird (Kyler@news.Lairds.org)
Date: 01/26/03
- Next message: Ian Gregory: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Previous message: Richard Caley: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- In reply to: Roy Smith: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Next in thread: Bill Lewis Clark: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Reply: Bill Lewis Clark: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Kyler Laird <Kyler@news.Lairds.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:23:28 GMT
Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes:
>wclark@eden.rutgers.edu (Bill Lewis Clark) wrote:
>> Can anyone come up with some GOOD reasons to prefer su to direct root
>> logins?
>It leaves an audit trail.
I hope that someone who has gone to the trouble of thinking
this through as much as Bill has wouldn't be so naive as to
let people log in to the root account using a (single shared)
password. It's fairly simple to log the people who use an
account by tracking the keys used.
Of course doing this will eliminate the joys of generating,
distributing and protecting the root password.
--kyler
- Next message: Ian Gregory: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Previous message: Richard Caley: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- In reply to: Roy Smith: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Next in thread: Bill Lewis Clark: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Reply: Bill Lewis Clark: "Re: PermitRootLogin=yes versus su"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|