Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?
From: Alessandro Selli (adoro.lo.spam@libero.it)
Date: 01/09/03
- Next message: Patrick Van der Veken: "Re: Port forwarding through SOCKS server (SSH tunneling)"
- Previous message: Darren Tucker: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- In reply to: Kirt : "telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Next in thread: Kirt : "[off-topic] etiquette tangent (was: telnet replacement)"
- Reply: Kirt : "[off-topic] etiquette tangent (was: telnet replacement)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Alessandro Selli <adoro.lo.spam@libero.it> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:31:27 +0100
Il giorno Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Kirt Loki Dankmyer cosė ha scritto:
|From: Kirt Loki Dankmyer <xiombarg@fnord.io.com>
|Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 08:32:22 -0600
|Subject: telnet replacement - not ssh?
|
|Okay, so everyone knows telnet isn't secure -- it sends all data,
|including passwords, in the clear. But I need to be able to connect to
|certain machines to administer them remotely. (IRIX 6.5 boxes, for those
|who care.)
[...]
Newsgroups:
comp.unix.questions,comp.security.unix,comp.security.ssh,comp.security.misc,
comp.security
Aren't you cross-posting too much? It's not very nice reading the same post
and the answers it gets five times. What would it happen would everyone do
that?
Sandro
--
Bellum se ipsum alet
La guerra nutre se stessa
Livio, Ab urbe condita, XXXIV,9
- Next message: Patrick Van der Veken: "Re: Port forwarding through SOCKS server (SSH tunneling)"
- Previous message: Darren Tucker: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- In reply to: Kirt : "telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Next in thread: Kirt : "[off-topic] etiquette tangent (was: telnet replacement)"
- Reply: Kirt : "[off-topic] etiquette tangent (was: telnet replacement)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]