Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication
From: Darren Tucker (dtucker@dodgy.net.au)
Date: 01/07/03
- Next message: Alexander Tabakov: "Putty on Windows 2000 doesn't work"
- Previous message: rossi: "problems with scp in batch mode"
- In reply to: Brian Whitehead: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: dtucker@dodgy.net.au (Darren Tucker) Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 12:01:13 GMT
In article <655aab98.0301062120.484edbe0@posting.google.com>,
Brian Whitehead <brian@whiteheadconsulting.com> wrote:
>If this is a feature then it most definitely should be documented. I
>would venture to guess that there are a lot of sysadmins out there
>that think that the accounts that they have disabled should not be
>able to access their servers.
Damien has just committed a modified version of my suggested patch
to the CVS tree, so it's officially a bug and it's fixed.
--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
- Next message: Alexander Tabakov: "Putty on Windows 2000 doesn't work"
- Previous message: rossi: "problems with scp in batch mode"
- In reply to: Brian Whitehead: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|