Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication
From: Brian Whitehead (brian@whiteheadconsulting.com)
Date: 01/06/03
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: Monitor_read causes crash?"
- Previous message: clehopatra@web.de: "Re: ssh and public key auth"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: brian@whiteheadconsulting.com (Brian Whitehead) Date: 6 Jan 2003 10:46:45 -0800
slade@shore.net (Richard E. Silverman) wrote in message news:<m1l8yxyapcu.fsf@syrinx.oankali.net>...
> >>>>> "BW" == Brian Whitehead <brian@whiteheadconsulting.com> writes:
>
> BW> I've found that an system account that I had disabled has been
> BW> able to authenticate with a ssh publickey...
>
> What do you mean by "disabled?"
By disabled I mean simply that the account has the ! in the shadow
file by using 'usermod -L'.
To me this would be a bug. An administrator should not have to jump
through hoops to disable all access to a machine for a specific user.
Simply disabling the primary account should disable everything
including ssh.
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: Monitor_read causes crash?"
- Previous message: clehopatra@web.de: "Re: ssh and public key auth"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: disabled account accepting publickey authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|