Re: Anonymous sftp
From: Chris Thompson (cet1-nospam@cam.ac.uk.invalid)Date: 08/22/02
- Next message: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Previous message: : "sftp and default file permission question"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: cet1-nospam@cam.ac.uk.invalid (Chris Thompson) Date: 22 Aug 2002 20:39:26 GMT
In article <Pine.GSO.4.44.0208211736160.23231-100000@grover.rite-group.com>,
Rich Teer <rich@rite-group.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Akop Pogosian wrote:
>
>> more robust package like proftpd. I haven't looked at Solaris 9 ftpd
>> yet.
>
>Apparently, it's based on the wu-ftpd.
Which has an absolutely horrendous history of security problems. This
change is not likely to make Solaris administrators sleep more soundly,
I feel.
> How THAT compares to
>proftpd, I don't know (I use the latter).
Proftpd has a somewhat better record, to damn it with faint praise ...
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 [at] cam.ac.uk
- Next message: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Previous message: : "sftp and default file permission question"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Next in thread: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Reply: Rich Teer: "Re: Anonymous sftp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
