Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel@bellatlantic.net)Date: 03/29/02
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: No worry for losing passwords!"
- Previous message: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- In reply to: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- Next in thread: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- Reply: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@bellatlantic.net> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 03:19:44 GMT
"goo" <goo@q.com> wrote in message
news:OGQo8.21905$mA1.2115863@news20.bellglobal.com...
> I was wondering about this. Is there any need for ssh1? What popular
> clients use it?
Almost all now support both clients: there are antique sites that only
support ssh1 because you'll only pry their current binaries from their cold,
dead fingers. (I've run into this in both academia and industry.)
- Next message: Nico Kadel-Garcia: "Re: No worry for losing passwords!"
- Previous message: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- In reply to: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- Next in thread: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- Reply: goo: "Re: Diable ssh1 (OpenSSH)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|