Re: which is safer ? - SSH Tunnel through firewall or port forwarding from firewall to SSH ?
From: Andrew E. Schulman (andrew-schulman@deadspam.com)Date: 02/21/02
- Next message: Russ: "Re: bad packet length"
- Previous message: Richard Silverman: "Re: Error message when trying to use with the ssh version 3.1.0"
- In reply to: bongo: "Re: which is safer ? - SSH Tunnel through firewall or port forwarding from firewall to SSH ?"
- Next in thread: bongo: "Re: which is safer ? - SSH Tunnel through firewall or port forwarding from firewall to SSH ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Andrew E. Schulman <andrew-schulman@deadspam.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:05:20 -0500
> > This means that you will have user accounts that is allowed to logon
> > from the outside, that sounds like a bad idea.
>
> But this is the case in situation b) too - or how do you authenticate the
> user to access CVS ?
The difference is that in the first case, you have to have a user logon
account on the firewall.
-- To reply by e-mail, change "deadspam" to "home"
- Next message: Russ: "Re: bad packet length"
- Previous message: Richard Silverman: "Re: Error message when trying to use with the ssh version 3.1.0"
- In reply to: bongo: "Re: which is safer ? - SSH Tunnel through firewall or port forwarding from firewall to SSH ?"
- Next in thread: bongo: "Re: which is safer ? - SSH Tunnel through firewall or port forwarding from firewall to SSH ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|