scp much slower than ftp (again).
From: Ryo Furue (furufuru@ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp)Date: 01/21/02
- Next message: Andreas Meile: "Re: How to easily configure SSH for unattended batchs in SuSE Linux?"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: Making OpenSSH listen to external interfaces"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: scp much slower than ftp (again)."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: furufuru@ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Ryo Furue) Date: 21 Jan 2002 01:54:23 -0800
Hi all,
By searching an archive of past articles of this newsgroup, I noticed
this issue has been raised repeatedly. I'm suffering from the same
problem. (2000KB/s with ftp; 300KB/s with scp; 200KB with scp -C).
If I understand correctly, scp tends to be slower than ftp because it
encrypts the data. This makes me wonder: Is it possible to tell ssh
(or its family) not to encrypt the data? In other words, is it
possible to use ssh only to authentificate myself? I prefer scp to
ftp solely because scp keeps my password from being transferred over
the Internet in plaintext. I don't need to keep my data secret. I
don't mind if anybody steals my data!
The remote host has only SSH1
SSH Version 1.2.27 [], protocol version 1.5
and I can't do anything about that.
I think I could accomplish what I want if I could "speak to" the
remote ftp daemon in the FTP "language" over the SSH channel....
Thank you,
Ryo
- Next message: Andreas Meile: "Re: How to easily configure SSH for unattended batchs in SuSE Linux?"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: Making OpenSSH listen to external interfaces"
- Next in thread: Atro Tossavainen: "Re: scp much slower than ftp (again)."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|