Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?
From: Doctor Zen (hidden@from.spammers.net)Date: 12/29/01
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Previous message: Doctor Zen: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- In reply to: nickd@nospam.demon.co.uk: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Next in thread: Doctor Zen: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Doctor Zen <hidden@from.spammers.net> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 14:55:13 +0000
nickd@nospam.demon.co.uk wrote:
> Richard E. Silverman <slade@shore.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> "DZ" == Doctor Zen <hidden@from.spammers.net> writes:
>>
>> DZ> ssh 3.0.1 (commercial) and chkrootkit v0.33 When I run chkrootkit
>> DZ> locally it reports sshd not vulnerable, but when I ssh into the
>> DZ> box and then run chkrootkit on it in the shell I get "sshd
>> DZ> vulnerable but disabled".
> Chkrootkit only works locally, worth two minutes of your time Mr.
> Silverman
Ah, that looks like the answer! Thanks everyone.
doc
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Previous message: Doctor Zen: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- In reply to: nickd@nospam.demon.co.uk: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Next in thread: Doctor Zen: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|