Re: SSH.com and Greek codepage.
From: Simon Tatham (anakin@pobox.com)Date: 12/29/01
- Next message: Henri Karrenbeld: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH.com and Greek codepage."
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH.com and Greek codepage."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Simon Tatham <anakin@pobox.com> Date: 29 Dec 2001 10:10:35 +0000 (GMT)
>>>>>> "GI" == G Ilias <diktiomenos@hotmail.com> writes:
> GI> I do not wish to use PuTTY as my main ssh client due to its
> GI> inabivility to communicate with SSH2.
Richard E. Silverman <slade@shore.net> wrote:
> Huh? PuTTY does speak SSH protocol version 2, and has for a while now.
OTOH, he said he was using 0.51, in which case he won't have
public-key authentication in SSHv2.
In the development snapshots (soon to be a 0.52 release hopefully)
this is now implemented.
-- Simon Tatham "I thought I'd put my foot so far into my mouth I <anakin@pobox.com> wouldn't be able to sit down without standing up."
- Next message: Henri Karrenbeld: "Re: chkrootkit reporting sshd vulnerable?"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH.com and Greek codepage."
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH.com and Greek codepage."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]