Re: one SSH better then the other?
From: Alan J. Flavell (flavell@mail.cern.ch)Date: 12/20/01
- Next message: nickd@nospam.demon.co.uk: "Re: ssh and hosts.allow; purpose of ssh"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSL vs HTTPS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@mail.cern.ch> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 23:29:41 +0100
On Dec 13, Dave inscribed on the eternal scroll:
> A comment was made that security
> professionals agree that open source is not secure.
I'd say quite the opposite. Real security professionals know that, in
general, security by obscurity doesn't work - they want open,
peer-reviewed source code.
> Needless to say,
> I was talking about using OpenSSH while they want FSecure.
If they want to pay for it, don't stop them: either way, you'll be
ahead of where you were before.
Hang on, why are you raising this here (c.s.unix)? - there is an SSH
group, you know. x-posted and f'ups set.
- Next message: nickd@nospam.demon.co.uk: "Re: ssh and hosts.allow; purpose of ssh"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSL vs HTTPS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|