Re: Why unhashing is not possible?
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Dec 2007 10:01:56 +0100
Randell_D <fiprojects.com@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've always led the belief that if something can be created/built,
then it can be "uncreated/unbuilt".
Please read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy
or just smash a tumbler and try to "uncreate" it again from sherds.
So... my question here to you good people is... why can't a hash be...
well... unhashed?
Oh, it can. It's just very expensive. If cost is real-world computing
time, it's often far too expensive.
That's the trick.
Yours,
VB.
--
The file name of an indirect node file is the string "iNode" immediately
followed by the link reference converted to decimal text, with no leading
zeroes. For example, an indirect node file with link reference 123 would
have the name "iNode123". - HFS Plus Volume Format, MacOS X
.
- References:
- Why unhashing is not possible?
- From: Randell_D
- Why unhashing is not possible?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why unhashing is not possible?
- Next by Date: Re: Why unhashing is not possible?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why unhashing is not possible?
- Next by thread: Re: Why unhashing is not possible?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
