Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: "Sebastian G." <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:16:12 +0200
Barry Margolin wrote:
Nothing can protect from trojan horses
If the AV software has its signature, it will.
That's a really big if.
Nothing can prevent you from unknown trojan horses, though.
Nothing can protect you from known trojan horses which simply don't have any
signature, because they're modifying themselves in a way that doesn't expose
any scanable patterns.
Thus the real solution is to not run any untrustworthy software, whereas
trust has to apply to the vendor, the quality of the implementation and the
quality of the software creation process.
.
- References:
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Neil W Rickert
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- Next by Date: Re: typical approach for encryption using keys?
- Previous by thread: Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- Next by thread: Re: OpenDNS safer or not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|