Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman <RedForeman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 May 2007 11:14:16 -0700
On May 7, 12:40 pm, "Sebastian G." <s...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RedForeman wrote:
[wipfw]I'll try that.... r u running the stable, current, or experimental
version?
There are very few software packages where running anything but the most
recent stable/release version is would be a sound advice. After all, do you
want to work on a stable system or experiment around with the integrity of
your data?
True, but I rarely 'rollout' to my own machine.... it's invariably one
of the 'other' boxes...
I'll have to play with wipfw.conf some more, but it seems basic
enough...
RedForeman
.
- References:
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: RedForeman
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- From: Sebastian G.
- Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- Prev by Date: Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- Next by Date: Re: Easter Eggs and Security
- Previous by thread: Re: How should I interpret these virus statements by F-Prot
- Next by thread: UPNP settings (DSL)
- Index(es):