Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez <do-not-spam-me@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:36:37 +0200
Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx> (07-04-18 19:18:05):
You can place anything under SSL, be it TCP/IP, UDP/IP or even
something entirely different than IP.
That's not completely true. RFC 4346 says in it's introduction
already:
| At the lowest level, layered on top of some reliable transport
| protocol (e.g., TCP[TCP]), is the TLS Record Protocol.
This implies, that you cannot use UDP for TLS, because UDP is not
reliable.
Firstly we're talking about SSL, not TLS. Secondly, we have a free
layer 5, where we can make unreliable transport protocols reliable.
Regards,
Ertugrul Söylemez.
--
From the fact that this CGI program has been written in Haskell, it
follows naturally that this CGI program is perfectly secure.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- From: xpyttl
- Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- References:
- SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- From: Jackie
- Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
- Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- From: Volker Birk
- SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- Prev by Date: Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- Next by Date: Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- Previous by thread: Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- Next by thread: Re: SSL vs. SSL over tcp/ip
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|