Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Ertugrul Soeylemez <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:00:18 +0100
"Jackie" <zhang_huijuan@xxxxxxxxxxx> (07-03-19 22:29:19):
Thanks, I tried, but I wonder how to rank them for different vendors,
does google do it? is first appeared the best/most popular?
No, Google does not. And there is one fundamental rule in choosing
products anything farly related to security: It must be fully open
source, and it must provide full documentation, including but not
limited to the algorithms and techniques used.
Many operating systems come with HD encryption facilities by themselves.
For Windows, which does not provide any security at all by itself, there
are basically two alternatives: FreeOTFE and TrueCrypt. Try both and
choose the one you like better.
By the way, you don't need to encrypt your entire HD. This is overkill
in most cases. Create an encrypted container for your personal
directory, whereever it is.
Regards,
E.S.
--
From the fact that this CGI program has been written in Haskell, it
follows naturally that this CGI program is perfectly secure.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Chris Mattern
- Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- References:
- Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Jackie
- Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Jackie
- Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Notan
- Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- From: Jackie
- Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- Prev by Date: Call for authors
- Next by Date: Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Laptop Security - harddisk encryption necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|