Re: Is additional firewall necessary?

Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DanS wrote:

Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:51v31cF1lim65U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

And, just for your convience I already assumed that you were
implicitly referring to the HTML vs. text rendering/creation option,
which I already denoted as non-working due to many bogus triggers
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(which seems to be just well known to anyone except you). Now, how
stupid do you want to get?

Maybe I just rephrase it, just that you finally get it: Deactivating
HTML rendering in the configuration dialog doesn't help anything to
actually fully deactivate HTML rendering.

Where does it say that on the MS webpage ? Or any webpage ?

When using text only viewer, the display pane is not an IE control, but
instead a Rich Edit control, thus dumping all HTML tags.

See above.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/883257#4

A web page ? An article ? Anything ? Come on.

What is Google? Yahoo? MSN Search? Come on.

Logical fallacy. May I suggest that - in addition to Debating 101 -
you enroll in Logic 101, where you will learn that one can't - and
hence doesn't have to - prove a negative.

So far, the simplest of such triggers has been the Reply button. If a
text/plain message contained some HTML tags and user tries to reply,
sometimes it will simply snap to HTML rendering.

(Again, and again and ...) *Cite*.
.