Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jan 2007 10:32:35 +0100
Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And what do probably 50% of POP3 e-mail users use......OE.Their fault. If they had read the documentation carefully, they'd know that
OE is trivially insecure when processing nontrustworthy content.
I really don't think so. You're overestimating totally, what people
understand.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Pornography is an abstract phenomenon. It cannot exist without a medium
to propagate it, and it has very little (if anything at all) to do with sex."
Tina Lorenz
<https://events.congress.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/events/1422.en.html>
.
- References:
- Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Dickie Peters
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Super Lemon
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: freesailor
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Todd H.
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: freesailor
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: freesailor
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: freesailor
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: DanS
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: DanS
- Is additional firewall necessary?
- Prev by Date: Re: ARP requests for IP address 0.0.0.0
- Next by Date: Re: DCPP
- Previous by thread: Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- Index(es):