Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2007 09:55:33 +0200
Super Lemon <fruit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However neither will protect outgoing packets on an
application basis.
And this is not neccessary, because it's useless.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Pornography is an abstract phenomenon. It cannot exist without a medium
to propagate it, and it has very little (if anything at all) to do with sex."
Tina Lorenz
<https://events.congress.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/events/1422.en.html>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Super Lemon
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- References:
- Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Dickie Peters
- Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- From: Super Lemon
- Is additional firewall necessary?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- Next by Date: Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Is additional firewall necessary?
- Index(es):