Re: practicle internet security question
- From: warf <warf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:33:26 GMT
xpyttl wrote:
"warf" <warf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:gGdgh.74832$hn.64998@xxxxxxxxxxxWell, I'd like to meet this Edi..th and find out why she is letting herself be overrun by Web.
Given that I have ascertained absolute privacy is impractical and every advance in mal-tactics results from the challenge of defeating security hardening improvements: There must be a pragmatic way to design a worldwide web that is inherently safe no?
It's called EDI, and it predated the web by a long way.
The reason the web is so useful is that pretty much anything is possible. That is exactly the reason it is so difficult to secure.
..
Is EDI too restrictive or too secure? The question is valid since a lot of what motivates a 'means' is the ends...and the end is nearly always money gained via advantage over competition.
The 'means' in this instance is the 'means whereby consumer
[CONs U & ME] is directly connected AND available [accessible].
.
- References:
- practicle internet security question
- From: warf
- Re: practicle internet security question
- From: xpyttl
- practicle internet security question
- Prev by Date: Re: Plausible reasons for http access?
- Next by Date: Re: evesdropping a computer how is it possible, how can it be prevented ?
- Previous by thread: Re: practicle internet security question
- Next by thread: Re: practicle internet security question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
