Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Oct 2006 08:59:57 +0200
Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK then, if you don't have any clue about TCP/IP, why are you running a
host-based packet filter?
I'm very happy about the Windows-Firewall as default, because this is
the second best option Microsoft could have chosen. It's idiotic, that
Windows also with XP SP2 starts unneccessary network services as
default, but it's good to know, that they're filtered away immediately
again.
It's idiotic, but second best.
Yours,
VB.
--
Viel schlimmer als die Implementation von PHP ist jedoch das Design.
Rudolf Polzer in de.comp.security.misc
.
- References:
- Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- From: Luther
- Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- From: mak
- Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- From: mak
- Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- From: mak
- Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- Prev by Date: Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- Next by Date: Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- Previous by thread: Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- Next by thread: Re: Dlink.com.sg intrusion with worm??
- Index(es):