Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- From: david20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1150547769.420494.241410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "computergeek6933@xxxxxxxxx" <computergeek6933@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
funluvinmax@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
thanks for your reply.
I thought A and B would be chatting purely P2P in this case - not thru
msn or yahoo servers?
With VPN, is there *no* chance that person C (inside the network) can
eavesdrop? If not - are there possibly other ways that person C (or D)
- in the vpn scenario - is able to eavesdrop?
No, according to the Oscar protocol for AIM there is no P2P
transmissions (unless you are direct connecting but I haven't read into
the semantics of that). I would assume that other Instant Message
protocols follow suit. In regards to your VPN question, while C would
be able to eavesdrop, the packets intercepted would be encrypted by the
VPN, proving useless to whoever is reading them.
"
Person A and Person B are both on an internal private network (either
directly on the LAN or VPNed into the LAN from an outside network)
"
To me that says the VPN is terminated on the internal network hence the traffic
on the internal network would be in the clear.
David Webb
Security team leader
CCSS
Middlesex University
.
- References:
- instant messenger eavesdropping question
- From: funluvinmax
- Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- From: computergeek6933@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- From: funluvinmax
- Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- From: computergeek6933@xxxxxxxxx
- instant messenger eavesdropping question
- Prev by Date: Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- Next by Date: Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- Previous by thread: Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- Next by thread: Re: instant messenger eavesdropping question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|