Re: Defending ARP Spoofing
- From: Sebastian Gottschalk <seppi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:45:49 +0100
Chris wrote:
Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:
Juergen P. Meier wrote:
The very best defense against ARP spoofing is to make sure your
network design and security concept does not rely on MAC addresses for
any of the following: Authentication, Authorisation, Identification.
What is about Denial of Service? In the sense of not being able to simply
flood the network, but razor-sharp ARP cache deconstruction.
This is a good point and explains why I started this discussion. I am
aware that you can design your network more securely, but if this is not
the case and you are simple a user of this network, what can you do?
As a simple user, it's your job to ask the administrator. :-)
As an administrator, you can either make the entire ARP table static
(and not allowing any dymanically created entries) on a static network
or you can try to limit the effects by carefully structuring your
network, including the usage of IEEE 802.X for authorization and to
track down potential disturbers to a network segment.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defending ARP Spoofing
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Defending ARP Spoofing
- Prev by Date: Re: Removing Norton
- Next by Date: Re: Defending ARP Spoofing
- Previous by thread: Re: Removing Norton
- Next by thread: Re: Defending ARP Spoofing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|