Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen".
From: David Taylor (djtaylor_at_bigfoot.com)
Date: 11/21/05
- Next message: Tom Thomas: "Hacked By Yusuf KARA"
- Previous message: erik.lynch_at_gmail.com: "Got hacked... need legal advise on action that I may take"
- Maybe in reply to: Frank Slootweg: "Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen"."
- Next in thread: Stephen K. Gielda: "Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen"."
- Reply: Stephen K. Gielda: "Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen"."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:24:37 GMT
> For all I know he could be completely mistaken? But it seems that a
> copyright is assumed (some of the laws changed in 70's and then in the 90's)
> at the moment of creation and posting to usenet doesn't make the assumption
I don't think the issue is about copyright at all, just the pointless
and incorrect statement that says that if the post is being read in a
browser and the domain isn't MS then it's used without permission.
A browser interface to usenet is not doing anything wrong, that's what
you're failing to understand.
- Next message: Tom Thomas: "Hacked By Yusuf KARA"
- Previous message: erik.lynch_at_gmail.com: "Got hacked... need legal advise on action that I may take"
- Maybe in reply to: Frank Slootweg: "Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen"."
- Next in thread: Stephen K. Gielda: "Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen"."
- Reply: Stephen K. Gielda: "Re: [OT] Silly (copyright?) claim by "Galen"."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
