defined topology (was Re: Defending ARP Spoofing)
From: Patrick Schaaf (mailer-daemon_at_bof.de)
Date: 11/08/05
- Next message: Patrick Schaaf: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson, mvp: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- In reply to: NAVTEJ KOHLI: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- Next in thread: Chris: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 08 Nov 2005 06:47:11 GMT
"NAVTEJ KOHLI" <navtejkohli@gmail.com> writes:
>Defined Topology based access in the firewall. Most of the firewall
>support this feature now - like pix , checkpoint etc.
What is this 'defined topology', technologically, that 'most firewalls'
support now?
Please be a bit specific about what is done, and under which external
conditions it will bear fruit. Keep in mind the original poster's
focus on nonchangeable campus networks. How will those be helped?
best regards
Patrick
- Next message: Patrick Schaaf: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- Previous message: Karl Levinson, mvp: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- In reply to: NAVTEJ KOHLI: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- Next in thread: Chris: "Re: Defending ARP Spoofing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|