Re: Case Security Question
From: Barry Margolin (barmar_at_alum.mit.edu)
Date: 09/30/05
- Next message: om.newsgroup_at_gmail.com: "Re: Generic Host Process for Win32 Services, Port 32729"
- Previous message: E.: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- In reply to: Colin B.: "Re: Case Security Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:45:29 -0400
In article <433c3cde@news.nucleus.com>,
"Colin B." <cbigam@somewhereelse.nucleus.com> wrote:
> Joachim Schipper <jDOTschipper@math.uu.nl> wrote:
>
> (snips)
>
> > Sidestepping the alleged kiddie porn (something *you* assumed, not
> > unreasonably, but which is contradicted in another part of this thread),
> > thieves who break into computers deserve what's coming for them too.
>
> For the record, I can take the blame for being the first to suggest
> kiddy-porn. That's pretty much the only porn that's unequivocably illegal
> throughout the world, and almost the only thing that's likely to get more
> than a few raised eyebrows in the western world. As you say though, the OP
> clearly contracticted this guess.
Perhaps "illegal" referred to the downloading, not the porn itself.
I.e. he was infringing the copyright of the pornographers.
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Next message: om.newsgroup_at_gmail.com: "Re: Generic Host Process for Win32 Services, Port 32729"
- Previous message: E.: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- In reply to: Colin B.: "Re: Case Security Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
