Re: Case Security Question

From: Joachim Schipper (jDOTschipper_at_math.uu.nl)
Date: 09/29/05 

Date: 29 Sep 2005 18:25:29 GMT

zt@zziper.biz wrote:
> "Justin Case" <me@noplace.com> writes:
>> She believes he husband has been viewing/
>> downloading/storing illegal porn.
>> He's an *** who is leaving her with 5
>> children, he's been very abusive to her.
>
> Felt like ths bit of the original post bore repeating.
>
> Folks, it doesn't sound like we're talking about run of the mill porn
> here, and not just a mildly jerky husband. Illegal tends to mean
> "kiddie," and if that's in fact the case as alleged, the SOB deserves
> EVERYTHING coming to him.

Sidestepping the alleged kiddie porn (something *you* assumed, not
unreasonably, but which is contradicted in another part of this thread),
thieves who break into computers deserve what's coming for them too.

And from other parts of the thread, it seems it's just 'legal' porn
gotten by hacking into porn websites. Neither speaks very highly of the
husbands' morals, but the first is firmly legal and the second will be
very difficult to get a conviction for, at least.

Besides, why assume the story is true? *I* know *I* don't trust the OP
to provide unbiased info, or something that's not utter bull***. (I.e.,
even if the story is true, the OP is too much of a party to the conflict
to give us an unbiased view).

                Joachim

Quantcast