Re: Case Security Question
From: Barry Margolin (barmar_at_alum.mit.edu)
Date: 09/29/05
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: Case Security Question"
- In reply to: Ari Silversteinn: "Re: Case Security Question"
- Next in thread: Colin B.: "Re: Case Security Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:06:15 -0400
In article <1dazz310qre3u.4v00lr1puq4z.dlg@40tude.net>,
Ari Silversteinn <abcarisilverstein@yahoo.comxyz> wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2005 19:20:28 GMT, Justin Case wrote:
>
> > I understand what you are saying, however according to her lawyer,
> > the computer is common property, meaning they both own it.
> > I don't think she wants him to go to jail, she still needs to support
> > 5 children. She didn't tell me "kiddy porn", but said he had the
> > ability to hack porn wedsites and downloaded videos.
> > Maybe video chats and such? There is no financial record she knows of.
> > She did mention he has had a addiction to porn for years and this
> > is destroying their marriage. What the content is, I don't know.
> > She wants a copy of his hard drive.
>
> Consider for a second that if it is common ownership, there is potentially
> common illegality. Take it to someone you trust, explain the situation, get
> the attorney involved on the front end but by no means duplicate the data
> and duplicate the liability.
It doesn't sound like she suspects anything illegal, just immoral. She
probably wants to use this to support her divorce case and win a custody
battle.
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: Case Security Question"
- In reply to: Ari Silversteinn: "Re: Case Security Question"
- Next in thread: Colin B.: "Re: Case Security Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|