Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?
From: Bob Eager (rde42_at_spamcop.net)
Date: 09/23/05
- Next message: johns: "Re: Ping wireless PC ???"
- Previous message: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 23 Sep 2005 00:29:30 GMT
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:13:55 UTC, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
> > In practice, you need to let a few ICMP messages through, then. For
> > example, source quench and destination unreachable.
>
> Wrong, you don't NEED to allow anything. You may FEEL that you do, but
> we've got almost 100 networks that don't allow ICMP or anything else
> inbound and they work just fine, and we'll not change them.
You're wrong. But that's fine. You just carry on.
-- [ 7'ism - a condition by which the sufferer experiences an inability to give concise answers, express reasoned argument or opinion. Usually accompanied by silly noises and gestures - incurable, early euthanasia recommended. ]
- Next message: johns: "Re: Ping wireless PC ???"
- Previous message: Hairy One Kenobi: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Ok to let all ICMP traffic through firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
