Re: certification

From: Todd H. (comphelp_at_toddh.net)
Date: 08/19/05

  • Next message: Buffalo: "Re: ZoneAlarm Service Agent popup"
    Date: 19 Aug 2005 10:09:00 -0500
    
    

    a_j_moran@yahoo.co.uk writes:
    > Hi Matt,
    >
    > > If you are looking to build technical skills, I recommend looking into
    > > the SANS information security certifications. There used to be both
    > > testing and practical components to their certifications, and I think
    > > that hands-on experience with peer review is both a better way to
    > > learn and a better way to certify. I'd follow up the SANS security
    > > certifications with the CISSP at some later date, if only because the
    > > CISSP is well known.
    >
    > Thanks for the SANS tip - I did look at this. The sample tests looked
    > easier than CISSP (at least the technical *NIX stuff was
    > straightforward for me). It would be interesting to hear what others
    > think of SANS vs. CISSP though.
    >
    > Does the CISSP cover more general principles or go into platform
    > specifics ?

    SANS is a training/cert organization:
            http://www.sans.org/aboutsans.php
    They are closely associated with GIAC certifications, of which there
    are many flavors:
            http://www.giac.org/certified_professionals/

    I believe SANS does also offer CISSP prep training, which confuses
    things a little. I work with a number of CISSP and GIAC certified
    folks, and am purusing CISSP at this point.

    CISSP is widely deemed as FAR easier to obtain than any of the GIAC
    certifications. The main reason is that GIAC certifications used to
    all require practicals:
            http://www.giac.org/practicals/

    ....while CISSP requires only that you pass a test. For instance, one
    manager in our security organization obtained his CISSP after spending
    a couple days with CISSP for dummies and sitting for the test. That's
    not to say CISSP is a creampuff cert by any stretch, but just one
    datapoint that indicates that it can be pretty easy to get for an
    experienced person.

    Caveat: It seems that GIAC has changed this practical stance:
            http://www.giac.org/practicals/termination.php

    > Good point. Workwise I get a lot of technical exposure and some
    > (though never enough) fun time to try out new kit (e.g., HSMs) or APIs.
    > My own "lab" (such as it is) is a couple of *BSD/Linux cohosted
    > installs and I use it mostly to do my own crypto and programming.

    Sounds like yer off to a fine start.

    Best Regards,

    -- 
    Todd H.
    http://www.toddh.net/
    

  • Next message: Buffalo: "Re: ZoneAlarm Service Agent popup"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: certification
      ... > the SANS information security certifications. ... > CISSP is well known. ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • RE: RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???
      ... referring to very early on when there was no Silver/Gold/Platinum for SANS ... they still mostly stop at silver and I ... GIAC and if you have the money OSSTMM and GIAC Gold are a strong pair. ... the majority of the more well-known certifications ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Training & Certifications
      ... Subject: Training & Certifications ... > Something curious to know about CISSP is this.... ... ISC2 told me that they never verify if anyone ... > that the person was not listed in the CISSP database on the ISC2 web site. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • RE: Advice on security certifications (CPTS yes or no)
      ... The most prestigious are the SANS GIAC GSE's. ... CPTS Certified Pen Testing Specialist and then CPTE Certified Pen ... Advice on security certifications ... Are there any certifications that are better than CPTS? ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: Certification Advice
      ... > You can no longer get your CISSP. ... > I am considering getting some certifications under ... > increase my security knowledge. ... > Captus Networks ...
      (Security-Basics)