Re: Should ATM service provided be held liable?
From: Frank Slootweg (this_at_ddress.is.invalid)
Date: 06/23/05
- Next message: jay: "Re: Call Centres in India"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: Call Centres in India"
- In reply to: Me_at_home.here: "Re: Should ATM service provided be held liable?"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Should ATM service provided be held liable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 23 Jun 2005 17:35:53 GMT
"GEO" wrote:
[deleted]
> Of course some people take it into their own hands:
> 'A man apparently angered after an ATM transaction went wrong fired 10
> shots into the Fendalton Westpac Trust branch in Christchurch,
> Australia with a .22 rifle early April 5.'
> <http://www.atmmarketplace.com/news_story.htm?i=19054>
If they can't get the country [1] right, then I doubt the rest of the
story.
[1] Christchurch is in New Zealand (and there is none in Australia).
> Geo
You don't say! :-)
- Next message: jay: "Re: Call Centres in India"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: Call Centres in India"
- In reply to: Me_at_home.here: "Re: Should ATM service provided be held liable?"
- Next in thread: Walter Roberson: "Re: Should ATM service provided be held liable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]