Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach
douglas.ross_at_gmail.com
Date: 05/30/05
- Next message: douglas.ross_at_gmail.com: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Previous message: M Trimble: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Next in thread: Unruh: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 May 2005 15:39:10 -0700
> The font face "protection" is irrelevant. No customer is going to be
> bothered that the relevant info is in a different typeface.
Valid point. I forgot to add a captain at the bottom (instead of the
800 number) that says something to the effect: if the fonts don't
match up, do not sign in!
> Remember that
phishers are catching the less knowledgeable and observant segment of
the
population anyway.
I hope that's true, but given the fact that I almost fell for an AT&T
WorldNet phishing scam... I'm not so sure...
Thanks
- Next message: douglas.ross_at_gmail.com: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Previous message: M Trimble: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- In reply to: Unruh: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Next in thread: Unruh: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: Request for comments - anti-phishing approach"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|