which hash function is secure?
cranium.2003_at_gmail.com
Date: 05/28/05
- Next message: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Previous message: MsOsWin_at_anon.com: "Re: What is a good freeware Internet privacy tracks eraser for WinXP?"
- Next in thread: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: wyattmd_at_gmail.com: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: Icebreaker: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 May 2005 02:46:50 -0700
hello,
On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_function its given that=>
The MD5 and SHA-1 algorithms are two popular but compromised
algorithms for generating cryptographic hash functions; the SHA-2
algorithm has no known compromises.
Then does that mean MD5 and SHA-1 are not one way that mean they
can be broken down?
regards,
cranium
- Next message: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Previous message: MsOsWin_at_anon.com: "Re: What is a good freeware Internet privacy tracks eraser for WinXP?"
- Next in thread: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: wyattmd_at_gmail.com: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Reply: Icebreaker: "Re: which hash function is secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]