Re: Key pair & Certificate lifetimes
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler (lynn_at_garlic.com)
Date: 04/28/05
- Next message: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Previous message: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- In reply to: vandananoSpam_at_nortel.com: "Key pair & Certificate lifetimes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:20:59 -0600
vandananoSpam@nortel.com writes:
> Are the public-private key pairs supposed to have the same lifetime as
> the certificate?? I could not find any specific mention either way in
> the RFCs.
RFCs tend to address technical issues .... certificate lifetime
tends to be a business issue ... involving (at least)
* expected validity lifetime of the information certified
* expected lifetime of the private key related to the public
key certified
* expected lifetime (non-exploit) of the CA's private key
* possibly, expected CA business lifetime
I've seen scenarios for 24hr (and even 8hr) certificates ... where the
information certified today couldn't be relied on to still be true
tomorrow.
The certificate model ... again, is the offline scenario evolving the
letters-of-credit paradigm left over (at least) the sailing ship days.
The person involved could have a credential and the relying party
relies on the credential in lieu of being able to directly contact the
authoritative agency responsible for the information.
the short-lived certificates are starting to blur the line regarding
whether the relying party would be better off directly contacting the
authoritative agency in real-time ... rather than relying on a stale,
static certificate provided by the party they were trying to validate.
there have also been a number of deployments where the relying party
went thru the motions of performing the digital certificate processing
and then, in real-time, went directly to the authoriative agency
responsible for the information anyway (making the use of a stale,
static certificate, redundant and superfluous).
-- Anne & Lynn Wheeler | http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
- Next message: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Previous message: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- In reply to: vandananoSpam_at_nortel.com: "Key pair & Certificate lifetimes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|