Re: Chaining x.509 certificates
From: jacost (jacostr_at_z.pl)
Date: 04/28/05
- Previous message: leslie: "Re: Formatted my drive, still spyware/virus, how is it possible?"
- In reply to: wdtj_at_yahoo.com: "Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Next in thread: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Reply: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:18:56 +0200
wdtj@yahoo.com napisaĆ(a):
> [...]
> It looks like, with https, our customer will need their own x.509
> certificate. They can, of course generate their own self-signed
> certificate, or get one from Verisign, et al.
If your user group is small, you can generate your own self-signed root
certificate (and key), and then generate certificates for your customers
using tools like OpenSSL (see the thread "Certificate Management Tools",
originated by TC on April 27, 18:35). You have to load your root
certificate into your customer's trusted certificate repositories to
avoid browser warnings.
> I'm wondering if there is a third option. For us to create a
> sub-certificate off of our current one.
A certificate contains extensions describing its allowed uses. The
certificate you got from Verisign probably doesn't allow
subcertification or issuing CRLs. So the software validating certificate
chain _should_ at least issue warnings on this.
> After digging through keytool and a whole pile of stuff on Google for a
> day (and barely scratching the surface), I still have not figured out
> the magical step of chaining a x.509 certificate. Keytool refers to
> importing a chained certificate from the CA, but nothing about how the
> CA creates it.
An answer by Ann & Lynn Wheeler to the post mentioned above lists many
references on this subject.
J.
- Previous message: leslie: "Re: Formatted my drive, still spyware/virus, how is it possible?"
- In reply to: wdtj_at_yahoo.com: "Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Next in thread: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Reply: Wayne Johnson: "Re: Chaining x.509 certificates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|