Re: More apparent M$ spyware

From: Michael Pelletier (mjpelletier_at_mjpelletier.com)
Date: 03/29/05 

Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:59:27 -0800

xpyttl wrote:

> "ralph" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:jICdndzvIaT-qNXfRVn-ow@rcn.net...
>
>> Of course he only "nitpickingly" tried to point out an errelevant error.
> It
>> seems to be Eric's obsession to defend MS at ALL COST. One of the tactics
>> he uses is to try to divert attention from the real issue by
> "nitpickingly"
>> errelevant errors.
>
> It's hardly irrelevant. Yef was blaming M$ for spyware, yet his own
> evidence points elsewhere. He is just too clueless to figure that out.
> And apparently, even after Erik explained it, YOU couldn't figure it out,
> probably because you assume that M$ is responsible for all the world's
> ills.
> Well I have a news flash for you. There is plenty of bad *** to go
> around. Microsloth doesn't have a monopoly.
>
> ..

Dude, decafe!...your paranoia is mind numbing... 

-- 
"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make really crappy operating systems." -
Linus Torvald