Re: Securing code in embedded devices
From: CBFalconer (cbfalconer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/15/05
- Previous message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Determining which sites are blocked at the office"
- In reply to: Nicholas O. Lindan: "Re: Securing code in embedded devices"
- Next in thread: Bruce Barnett: "Re: Securing code in embedded devices"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:02:09 GMT
"Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote:
>
... snip ...
>
> The most successful companies publish the source code for their
> products. Published schematics are SOP for h/p^H^H^HAgilent, IBM,
> Tektronix, consumer products etc. etc. etc..
I heartily agree. One problem is that some of the code, and some
of the circuitry, of commercial products are so bad that their
owners would be embarassed by publication. It happends in the
public domain world too - someone publishes a binary and hides the
embarassing source. That was the fate of NULU in the CP/M world
25+ years ago, for example. Everybody used it. About the same
time I published LT, and I believe that is still going.
-- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
- Previous message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Determining which sites are blocked at the office"
- In reply to: Nicholas O. Lindan: "Re: Securing code in embedded devices"
- Next in thread: Bruce Barnett: "Re: Securing code in embedded devices"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|