Re: Stopping Spam

From: David MacQuigg (dmq)
Date: 02/11/05

  • Next message: David MacQuigg: "Re: Stopping Spam"
    Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:51:03 -0700
    
    

    On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:04:37 +0000 (UTC), david20@alpha2.mdx.ac.uk
    wrote:
    >In article <nnin011e10t5u3lqdd7i93lglpb77chjcv@4ax.com>, David MacQuigg <dmq at gain.com> writes:
    >
    >>"Spam is a completely solvable problem. And it does not take finding
    >>every <spammer> to do it ..." AOL Postmaster Carl Hutzler, as quoted
    >>by John Levine in http://www.circleid.com/article/917_0_1_0_C/
    >
    >See some of the comments posted about that article (at the same URL).

    This was an awful lot of reading, and I see lots of vague or anecdotal
    complaints from people who may not know what they are talking about.
    There is big difference between anecdotal evidence (which tends to
    indict large companies) and a careful analysis of complaints vs total
    volume.

    One of the posters, Suresh Ramasubramanian, tried to pin down another
    who had complained that "allot of the spam/UCE I get is from AOL,
    Yahoo, Hotmail and a number of ccTLD based ISP's".

    Was the spam really from these large ISPs, or just some spammer
    forging their name? What percent of AOL's outgoing mail is spam? If
    that % is low, I'm much more likely to accept email from aol.com's
    authorized server, even though the absolute numbers are higher than
    some dinky little domain in Russia.

    Here are some excerpts from the exchange:
    """
    By Suresh Ramasubramanian | Posted on Jan 26, 2005 @ 2:12 AM PST
    To Jeffrey Williams -
    <<"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard>>
    Now, I'll ask a rather precise question. "A lot of the spam you get is
    from AOL, Yahoo etc". Is that "from yahoo / AOL's servers, and/or from
    accounts that actually exist on yahoo / aol" or "email from an address
    that has some random string @yahoo.com forged into the from"?

    By Jeffrey A. Williams | Posted on Jan 26, 2005 @ 11:43 PM PST
    To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
    Yes you were percise enough, thank you...
    To anawer your question to me, Suresh, yes almost all were legitimate
    AOL/YAHOO/ Hotmail Email addresses...
    BTW I am very accomplised in reading Email headers and spamcop does
    what it can but is not all that impressive.
    """

    Do you see the problem with this answer?

    What I would really like to see is a list that gives for each domain a
    ratio of spam to legitimate email. I list like that could really
    drive reform in this industry.

    -- Dave


  • Next message: David MacQuigg: "Re: Stopping Spam"

    Relevant Pages

    • Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
      ... AOL and Yahoo will still accept e-mail from senders who have not ... their AOL address books will not be treated as spam. ... e-mail, which, because of spam and worries about online scams, has ...
      (comp.dcom.telecom)
    • Reverse DNS question
      ... I have been frantically trying to deal with the issue of Yahoo and AOL ... I've also checked and don't find us in any spam ... I also ran a reverse DNS lookup. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Avoiding Junk Mail
      ... can it be used with other servers ie Yahoo? ... accepted method of blocking spam because the From: ... What GMail and Yahoo *do* support are two effective and flexible ... Since you're asking about Yahoo in comparison with AOL, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: If I had onw Id lose it
      ... The smart ones gave up on aol and yahoo years ago, but now you holdouts can ... expect express spam 24/7. ...
      (rec.motorcycles.harley)
    • Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
      ... (if somebody has posssibility to quote all that for ... our reading, welcome...) ... Do You Yahoo!? ... Mail has the best spam protection around ...
      (soc.genealogy.medieval)