Re: Back doors
From: David Dalton (dalton_at_nfld.com)
Date: 01/05/05
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Firewall for win95?"
- Previous message: David Dalton: "Re: Firewall for win95?"
- In reply to: Walter Roberson: "Re: Back doors"
- Next in thread: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Back doors"
- Reply: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Back doors"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Back doors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:11:52 -0330
On 4 Jan 2005 21:37:00 GMT, roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter
Roberson) wrote:
>In article <od1mt01ang0ru9amv40mj1qbsrj29cvcqg@4ax.com>,
>David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> wrote:
>:Do all firewalls have a back door which is provided to
>:secret service and law enforcement authorities?
>
>No. If you examine the Lawful Intercept RFC,
>http://cryptome.org/cisco-vile.txt
>then you will see that the intercept has to occur further down the
>route than the customer equipment, so that the customer is unable
>to detect the monitoring.
>
>So what you are back to is that old chestnut about whether
>3DES, AES, et al. contain backdoors. The consistant word on those is
>"None that anyone has been able to identify from the source or from
>several years of sophisticated examination."
>
>
>:If so, what is there to stop a member of such
>:agencies who is in a cult to pass the back door
>:info on to other members of his or her cult.
>:(e.g. cultish subsets of Born Again Christianity)
>
>Reminds me of the old days when people were talking about Clipper
>and Mandatory Key Escrow.
I also discuss the subject in the "Firewall for win95?" thread
where I point out that if cultish subsets of Born Again
Chrsitianity have access to such back doors they should
be investigated promptly since a subset of such cultish
subsets of Born Again Christianity wish to bring about the
end of the world via nulclear holocaust. I expect that
those knowing of the existence of such back doors would
be quick to poo poo such existence and may even be
in such cultish subsets of Born Again Christianity themselves.
But perhaps you are right, Walter, though cheap or free
firewalls are more likely to have such programmed in
back doors or otherwise have entry loopholes than
expensive ones, I bet.
This did not go to alt.conspiracy . :-)
David
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Firewall for win95?"
- Previous message: David Dalton: "Re: Firewall for win95?"
- In reply to: Walter Roberson: "Re: Back doors"
- Next in thread: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Back doors"
- Reply: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: Back doors"
- Reply: Walter Roberson: "Re: Back doors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|