Re: Firewall for win95?

From: David Dalton (dalton_at_nfld.com)
Date: 01/04/05 

Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:53:52 -0330

On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:37:57 -0330, David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
wrote:

>On 03 Jan 2005 22:12:24 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>[microsoft.public.windna.security deleted because my NSP does not carry
>>it and does not allow posting to nonexistent groups.]
>>
>>Lars M. Hansen <badnews@hansenonline.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:30:07 -0330, David Dalton spoketh
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Ha, I just posted that and someone inserted a
>>> >blank space between security. and firewalls
>>> >so it would not go to that group. That definitely
>>> >was not my typo, no way. That post shows
>>> >up on comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc .
>>> >
>>> >David
>>> >http://www.nfld.com/~dalton
>>>
>>> I don't know what you've been smoking, but you really need to give it
>>> up...
>>
>> I think it's his way of saying that the Newsgroups: line in his
>>original posting was broken, and indeed it was:
>>
>>> Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.security.,firewalls,comp.security.misc,microsoft.public.windna.security
>>
>> I.e. "comp.security.,firewalls" instead of "comp.security.firewalls".
>>
>> Either he *did* make that typo or Forte Free Agent or/and
>>utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net is/are severly broken. You decide.
>>
>> If anyone cares to explain the difference between a comma and "a
>>blank space", ...
>
>
>It was a blank space when I retrieved it from the newsserver
>immediately after posting it (when I typed NO BLANK SPACE)
>and then the blank space was converted to a comma
>by a hacker shortly after. Both the blank space and the
>comma, which you seem to have seen (so it was converted
>from blank space to comma before it left the newsserver)
>were not by me and I highly doubt by Free Agent, but by
>the work of a hacker, which is why I need a cheap or
>free firewall for Win95 with no back door, obviously.
>
>When I was on my niece's XP computer out of town
>with a firewall I noted still some such hackings, though
>fewer, so that firewall must have a back door.
>
>I suspect that all firewalls have a back door which
>they must provide to secret service and law
>enforcement people, and that some such law
>enforcement/computer security/secret service
>people are in cultish divisions (not all) of Born
>Again Christianity and are providing such back
>doors to those divisions, who are hacking me
>because of my theory that for 75% of the population
>threesomes or larger groups, involving some
>same sex interaction, will result in longer lifespan.
>
>e.g. I theorize a gay

non-platonically

>married to a woman will
>live 13 years less long than in a gay couple

or a celibate gay

>and 22 years less long than in a gay threesome
>or foursome. Some Born Agains do not want
>that theory researched.
>
>David
>http://www.nfld.com/~dalton
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Firewall for win95?
    ... >It was a blank space when I retrieved it from the newsserver ... >free firewall for Win95 with no back door, ... I theorize a gay married to a woman will ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Firewall for win95?
    ... >It was a blank space when I retrieved it from the newsserver ... >free firewall for Win95 with no back door, ... I theorize a gay married to a woman will ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Firewall for win95?
    ... >It was a blank space when I retrieved it from the newsserver ... >free firewall for Win95 with no back door, ... I theorize a gay ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Firewall for win95?
    ... >>It was a blank space when I retrieved it from the newsserver ... >>free firewall for Win95 with no back door, ... I theorize a gay ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Firewall for win95?
    ... >>It was a blank space when I retrieved it from the newsserver ... >>free firewall for Win95 with no back door, ... I theorize a gay ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
Quantcast