Re: Yet another reason to hate Yahoo BUT

From: Mike (NoSpam_at_NoSpam.net)
Date: 12/28/04


Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:13:31 -0500

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:36:32 GMT, Lady Chatterly
<nospam@catcher.in.the.rye> wrote:

>In article <lu60t0pgrlhdtfs0n6m0vbjla7e179lv29@4ax.com> Mike
><NoSpam@NoSpam.net> wrote:
>>
>>On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:38:52 -0500, Melroseman
>><melroseman@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I agree with Yahoo in this case. But consider this:
>>>
>>>You've been accused of murder. You catch up with the person who actually
>>>did the deed and convince them to confess. They write their confession
>>>and save it as a draft in their Yahoo inbox, promising to print it or
>>>send it out to the proper authorities in the morning. That morning,
>>>they're found dead.
>>>
>>>Should Yahoo give the proper authorities access? Has there been any case
>>>like this before?
>>
>>If the "proper authorities" have the "proper search warrant" obtained
>>through the "proper procesures"; then yes, Yahoo should provide
>>access. Otherwise no, they should not.
>
>Are you positive?

Yes, I gave up an electron just yesterday.